Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2013

Abstract

Lawyers, judges, and jurors face a vast array of visual evidence and visual argument inside the contemporary courtroom. From videos documenting crimes and accidents to computer displays of their digital simulation, increasingly, the search for fact-based justice is becoming an offshoot of visual meaning making. But when law migrates to the screen it lives there as other images do, motivating belief and judgment on the basis of visual delight and unconscious fantasies and desires as well as actualities. Law as image also shares broader cultural anxieties concerning not only the truth of the image, but also the mimetic capacity itself, the human ability to represent reality. What is real, and what is simulation? This is the hallmark of the baroque, when dreams fold into dreams – or should we say the digital baroque, when images on the screen immerse us in a seemingly endless matrix of digital appearances. Under current cultural conditions, jurists need training in visual literacy. That is what the theory and practice of visual jurisprudence aim to provide.

Share

COinS