Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-13-2006
Abstract
Plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Daniels, J.) granting summary judgment to all defendants-appellees-cross-appellants, (i) dismissing his claim for employment discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the District Court having determined that he did not establish a prima facie case of discrimination and that defendants had a legitimate nondiscriminatory basis for dismissing him; (ii) dismissing his claim for violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act, the District Court having determined that he (a) had not stated a claim on which relief could be granted and (b) did not establish his retaliation claim; (iii) dismissing his pendent state and municipal law claims; and (iv) denying his motion to amend his Complaint. Defendants-appellees-cross-appellants collectively appeal from the same judgment to the extent that it denies their motion for attorneys' fees and costs.
Recommended Citation
Miner '56, Roger J., "Sista v. CDC IXIS NORTH AMERICA, INC., Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2006" (2006). Circuit Court Opinions. 142.
https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/circuit_opinions/142
Comments
(2006)
A. MICHAEL SISTA, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,
v.
CDC IXIS NORTH AMERICA, INC., RAMINE ROUHANI, ADIL NATHANI, ALBERT ZAKES, LAWRENCE LAIER, and KEMEL MEHTA, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.
Nos. 05-1506-cv(L), 05-1625-cv(XAP).
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued: October 21, 2005.
Decided: April 13, 2006.
New York Law School location: Box #150, File #3432