Document Type
Article
Publication Date
8-7-1996
Abstract
Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (McKenna, J.) denying their motion for leave to amend their complaint to add additional plaintiffs. The district court found that the claims of the additional plaintiffs did not relate back to the date of the filing of the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c) and therefore that the claims of the additional plaintiffs were time-barred under the applicable statutes of limitations.
For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss the appeal.
Recommended Citation
Miner '56, Roger J., "Kahn v. Chase Manhattan Bank, NA, 91 F. 3d 385 - Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1996" (1996). Circuit Court Opinions. 197.
https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/circuit_opinions/197
Comments
91 F.3d 385 (1996)
Roselyn KAHN, Jan Kahn, individually and as custodian for Brad Michael Kahn and Brendan Adam Kahn under the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act, Craig Kahn, individually and as custodian for Alex Kahn under the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act, Jan Kahn and Craig Kahn as Trustees for and on behalf of Four Seasons Manufacturing Co., Inc., Pension Trust & Jan and Craig's Window Factory, Ltd., by its Trustee Ronald Lipshie, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A., Thomas J. Greene, Woodmere Securities, Inc., Richard Kahn, Bruce C. Black, Sheppard Messing, Jeffrey P. Berg, Matthias & Berg and Michael R. Matthias, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 1311, Docket 95-7925.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued April 19, 1996.
Decided August 7, 1996.
New York Law School location: File #2414, Box #136