Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-22-1998
Abstract
Plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee Dennis Curley appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Knapp, J.) insofar as it incorporates an order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee-cross-appellant 9*9 American Airlines, Inc. ("American"). In granting summary judgment, the district court applied New York law to dismiss claims of negligence and false imprisonment asserted by Curley against American. American cross-appeals from the same judgment insofar as it incorporates a putative order denying its motion for summary judgment to dismiss Curley's claims on the basis of Mexican law.
Applying Mexican law, we affirm the summary judgment entered in favor of American and dismiss the cross-appeal.
Recommended Citation
Miner, Roger J., "Curley v. AMR Corp., 153 F. 3d 5 - Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1998" (1998). Circuit Court Opinions. 225.
https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/circuit_opinions/225
Comments
153 F.3d 5 (1998)
Dennis CURLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,
v.
AMR CORPORATION; F.A. Kummire, Capt.; Humberto Dueñas, Defendants, American Airlines, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.
Nos. 96-9690, 97-7020.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued December 8, 1997.
Decided July 22, 1998.
New York Law School location: File #2613, Box #138