Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-11-2011
Abstract
Plaintiff-appellant Dorrit Matson appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Crotty, J.), dismissing, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), her civil rights action, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against defendants-appellees, the Board of Education of the City School District of New York (the "BOE"), the City of New York (the "City"), and Richard J. Condon (collectively, the "defendants"). In the action, Matson alleged that the BOE had publicly disclosed that she suffers from fibromyalgia, in violation of her constitutional right to privacy. The disclosure occurred when, in connection with an investigation of her purported use of sick leave, the BOE made available to the public on the website of the Special Commissioner of Investigation for the New York City School District ("SCI") a report that included Matson's medical condition. On appeal, Matson claims: (1) the District Court erred in concluding that she failed to establish that the defendants' disclosure of her medical condition implicated a protected privacy interest; (2) the District Court incorrectly found the BOE to be an improper party; and (3) the District Judge should have recused himself, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455.
For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
Recommended Citation
Miner '56, Roger J., "Matson v. BD. OF EDUC., CITY SCH. DIST. OF NY, 631 F. 3d 57 - Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2011" (2011). Circuit Court Opinions. 429.
https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/circuit_opinions/429
Comments
631 F.3d 57 (2011) Dorrit MATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, The City of New York, Richard J. Condon, Defendants-Appellees.[*] Docket No. 09-3773-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued: August 25, 2010. Decided: January 11, 2011.
New York Law School location: Box 155, File 3969