Volume 48, Issue 1 Criminal Defense in the Age of Terrorism
The New York Law School Center for Professional Values and Practice sponsored this symposium devoted to criminal defense in the age of terrorism. No lawyers are under greater pressure than criminal defense attorneys charged with representing accused terrorists. The federal government is a formidable foe in run-of-the-mill criminal cases; it is a truly awesome opponent in terrorism prosecutions because of the fervor, ingenuity, and resources it brings to these cases. This issue examined the vital role played by defense lawyers representing accused terrorists who face deep hostility from a public whose foremost priority is winning the war on terrorism. This issue was originally published as Issues 1 & 2.Article
Unpatriotic Acts: An Introduction
Sadiq Reza
The Material Witness Statute Post September 11: Why It Should Not Include Grand Jury Witnesses
Robert Boyle
The Jose Padilla Story
Donna R. Newman
Turning the Tables: Using the Government’s Secrecy and Security Arsenal for the Benefit of the Client in Terrorism Prosecutions
Sam A. Schmidt and Joshua L. Dratel
Creating a Public Defender System in the Shadow of the Israeli – Palestinian Conflict
Kenneth Mann and David Weiner
A Double Due Process Denial: The Crime of Providing Material Support or Resources to Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations
Randolph N. Jonakait
Eyes Tied Shut: Litigating for Access Under CIPA in the Government’s “War on Terror”
Cameron Stracher
The Torture Warrant: A Response to Professor Strauss
Alan M. Dershowitz
Notes
Are Your Eyes Deceiving You?: The Evidentiary Crisis Regarding the Admissibility of Computer Generated Evidence
Betsy S. Fiedler
Rethinking the Role of Expert Testimony Regarding The Reliability of Eyewitness Identifications in New York
Scott Woller
Case Comments
United States v. Langford
Amy Garzon
State v. Patton
Orit Tulchinsky