Volume 57, Issue 4 Trial by Jury or Trial by Motion? Summary Judgment, Iqbal, and Employment Discrimination
The articles in this issue examine in-depth the application of Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal in employment discrimination cases, analyze the high failure rates of plaintiffs on pre- and post-trial motions, and offer specific insights into the issues that impact judicial decisionmaking in these cases. The issue is based on the Trial by Jury or Trial by Motion? Summary Judgment, Iqbal, and Employment Discrimination symposium held at New York Law School in April 2012. The symposium was developed and co-sponsored with The Employee Rights Advocacy Institute For Law & Policy, and was dedicated to the memory of Robert Belton, Professor Emeritus of Vanderbilt Law School, who passed away in February 2012. Professor Belton was a founding member of The Institute’s National Litigation Strategy Project, and this symposium was his brainchild.Articles
The Jury (or More Accurately the Judge) Is Still Out for Civil Rights and Employment Cases Post-Iqbal
Suzette M. Malveaux
Bringing Back Reasonable Inferences: A Short, Simple Suggestion for Addressing Some Problems at the Intersection of Employment Discrimination and Summary Judgment
HON. BERNICE B. DONALD and J. ERIC PARDUE
“Only Procedural”: oughts on the Substantive Law Dimensions of Preliminary Procedural Decisions in Employment Discrimination Cases
ELIZABETH M. SCHNEIDER and HON. NANCY GERTNER
Inferences in Employment Law Compared to Other Areas of the Law: Turning the Rules Upside Down
DAVID L. LEE and JENNIFER C. WEISS
Stopped at the Starting Gate: e Overuse of Summary Judgment in Equal Pay Cases
DEBORAH THOMPSON EISENBERG
Cognitive Illiberalism, Summary Judgment, and Title VII: An Examination of Ricci v. DeStefano
ANN C. MCGINLEY
Northeast Natural Energy, LLC v. City of Morgantown
EMERY L. LYON